I can’t think of another sexual activity that divides the gay male community the way barebacking does. It is an emotionally charged topic because it comes with some possible serious consequences. It’s very much related to that old truth: people who learn nothing from history are doomed to repeat it. Proponents say barebacking (sex without a condom) is the height of hedonistic irresponsibility, puts people at risk for and increases the spread of STDs, and gives ample ammunition to those who take issue with the gay community and the way gay men conduct their lives. Enthusiasts would argue that it is a matter of personal choice and a natural expression of their sexuality. In between? People, like me, who see both points of view while frequently struggling with the issue in light of their own personal behavior.
Is either side correct?
Let’s toss aside that condom and dive right into the raw facts about…
Scope of Activity:
Unprotected sex, typically butt sex without a condom. For the sake of this post we will limit our discussion to male on male anal sex. Also known as ‘raw sex’.
The Official Line:
From Wikipedia
Bareback is a slang term to describe acts of sexual penetration without the use of a condom. The term comes from the equestrian term bareback, which refers to the practice of riding a horse without a saddle. Barebacking usually refers to a conscious and deliberate choice to forgo condoms.
Initially used for contraceptive purposes, condoms also came to be used to limit or prevent sexually transmitted diseases. As AIDS emerged and the sexual transmission of HIV became known in the 1980’s, the use of condoms to prevent infection became much more widespread, especially among homosexual men. At the beginning of the AIDS crisis, in the context of the invention and development of safe sex, the uptake of condoms among Western gay men was so widespread and effective that condom use became established as a norm for gay sex. From 1995 several high profile HIV positive men declared their refusal to wear condoms with other HIV positive gay men in gay publications, dubbing the practice ‘barebacking’. While these early articulations of barebacking expressed a concern for HIV prevention in that they generally referred to dispensing with condoms in the context of sex between people of the same HIV status, the moral panic which ensued was so pronounced that barebacking came to be framed as a rebellious and transgressive erotic practice for HIV positive and HIV negative people alike, irrespective of the risks of HIV transmission.
A resurgence of barebacking in first-world gay communities during the 1990s has been a frequent topic for gay columnists and editorialists in The Advocate, Genre magazine and Out magazine.
Varying factors are sited when looking to explain the recent popularity of bare back sex. Among them:
- Fear of HIV has been minimized due to the development and success of protease inhibitors. These drugs have changed the status of HIV from ‘untreatable’ and ‘terminal’ to ‘treatable’ and ‘chronic’. There currently are studies claiming that the likelihood of a non-detectible (>75) HIV positive person passing the virus to others is slim to none.
- Some people only seek out partners with a similar HIV status and therefore don’t see a reason to use condoms. This practice puts HIV positive men at risk of contracting additional strains of the virus, and has given rise to the concept of the HIV superinfection. Serosorting (identifying an individual’s strain of HIV) is thought of one way to prevent men from exposing themselves to different strains.
- Condom fatigue: people have heard the message of safe sex for so long now they have stopped responding to it.
- The rise of ParTying: Use of drugs (Crystal Meth in particular) in relation to having sex lowers people’s inhibitions and causes them to become less concerned about their personal safety and well-being resulting in these individuals participating in unsafe activities and associating with people they normally would not.
- The rise of barebacking sites such as BBRTS lend credence to the practice and provides a means for like-minded individuals to find one another.
Well, ummm…. Hmmmm. This point would seem to be moot, but there are things one can do to help decrease the risks at hand:
- Knowing your partner would be a good start, or at least sharing information regarding each other’s HIV status – otherwise known as ‘the talk’. Discussing sexual history (recent) might also prove helpful. But keep in mind, people don’t always disclose or tell the truth. If you are HIV positive and know your serotype, that could prove beneficial, provided your sexual partner also knows his.
- Doing a visual physical examination on one another is always a good idea, but not a guarantee of anything.
- Practicing good hygiene also a good idea, but, again, not a guarantee of anything.
- Living a healthy lifestyle – eating healthy foods, exercising, getting adequate rest – not only will you look your best, but your immune system will also be firing on all cylinders.
- Avoiding alcohol and drugs. ParTying can result in you putting your body in riskier situations than you would if you were not under the influence of something and also weaken the immune system.
What’s the frequency, Kenneth?
This practice has been rationalized a number of ways.
There is a segment of the gay population who feel that fucking ‘raw’ is the way God intended people to fuck. They see this as natural and a natural form of sexual expression.
Then there are those who see it as a form of rebellion against the Safe Sex Police, the medical community, political entities, and those with axes to grind against the gay community.
There are those that simply enjoy it. Condoms are restrictive by design. They inhibit sensation and blood flow to the penis. Some men cannot maintain an erection with a condom. This can lead to a form of psychological erectile dysfunction – a self-defeating loop of thoughts and fear resulting in a neurotic reaction to condoms or the contemplation of sex.
Bug Chasers: Myth or reality? From what I have read in personal blogs on the net, I have come to the conclusion that these individuals are not the stuff of fiction. There is a documentary called “The Gift” (2008) that explores this phenomenon. Bug Chasers seek out HIV positive partners who engage in barebacking. The goal of the Bug Chaser is to become infected with the HIV virus. Their motivations vary. Some seek inclusion, as they view the HIV community as being an exalted and elite group, while others see that the life of HIV positive individuals as glamorous and normal.
Pig Sex: While there certainly are gay sex pigs whom practice safer sex, they are not the norm. Surrendering one’s body to the sexual whims of others puts one at all sorts of risk, and part of the mindset of a sex pig is to be exposed to bodily fluids of all kinds, including sperm, from as many partners as possible. This helps satisfy the primal urge that drives these magical beasts.
The bigger questions remains – why would someone willingly participate in an activity that they know puts them in harms way? It brings a whole new meaning to the term ‘Thrill of the Kill’. Isn’t there a horror film out there about an HIV positive serial barebacker? I bet there will be. But in this connotation I think ‘The Kill’ is an action more suicidal than homicidal. Do we bareback because we hate ourselves enough to want to do harm to ourselves? Is this self-hate because society reinforces the message that to be gay is to be wrong and bad? Do we then internalize that message and want to eliminate ourselves?
Is barebacking really a form of biological genocide?
I have never been a hardcore advocate of safer sex or barebacking. I tend to let the person I’m with decide whether or not condoms are involved. Based on my recent experiences (the past four years), I have seen a major preference for barebacking, but that observation is based on only my own experiences.
Condom use is the primary reason that I am no longer a top. Up until 1996, I was a hardcore top, bottoming only when in a monogamous relationship. I don’t recall that condoms became an issue for me until 1996, when, after a few less than spectacular performances, I began to experience a kind of anxiety related to their use. I think this is rather common, as I have spoken to numerous individuals about barebacking and their experiences dealing with condoms. For me, condoms seemed to kill my boner. And once that started happening, then the anxiety related to boner failure took over and I began to avoid topping altogether.
Age probably also plays a part in my conversion. I see more and more former hardcore tops becoming seed-seeking bottoms. And it’s a shame, too, because many of these dudes were blessed with high-quality pieces of meat.
But why have I become a bareback bottom? I think it has a lot to do with the attitude of the men who bareback. They are more accepting of others – which critics could frame as: they have lower standards – but I disagree. They have different standards. They appreciate real men. Men with flaws. Men with body odor and body fluids.
(Spoiler Alert: Unrelated, Undocumented, Unfounded Tangent Rant Fast Approaching)
And I am not alone. I would ask you to visit ‘Life In The Raw’ mindtrip-lifeintheraw.blogspot.com a blog written by Mindtrip, a man I would characterize as something of a sexual warrior – and read his post on11/28/12. Also, check the side of my blog site to discover the blogs of a number of other sexual warriors willing to share their personal exploits. Even if you don’t agree with their personal sexual practices and world views, you’re sure to find a post that will have you jerking your gherkin.
Oh, and if you want specific stories related to my personal experiences taking raw dick up the ass, just flip through my past posts. Yeah… I know – I’m a total butt slut.
These days, I only top bareback. If that’s an issue, than I don’t wanna fuck ya. As a bottom, I take it however my top wants to serve it up – and I love it. I am kind of a modified ass pig. I can’t seem to take it to the extreme like some dudes do. I don’t seem to run with the right crowd or live in the right city for that to happen. And, yes, I frequently regret my behavior. I omit the truth when talking to my doctor about my sex life (she’s convinced I am a sex addict and wants me to seek ‘help’ – and yes, she has a point). I have contracted several STDs in my lifetime (nothing life altering, yet). I struggle with guilt and shame and know in my heart of heart’s that taking raw dick up the ass is simply not a good idea.
But I do. I take raw dick up the ass. And I can’t really rationalize it, explain it, or justify it. I just do.
You see, I think that in the world of gay sex, as large and varied a place as that is, it is every man for himself. You get to do what you like to do, with whomever will do it with you/to you/for you. I may not understand or share your particular interest, but I applaud you for having the courage to explore your sexual self. I’m not going to pass judgment on you based on what you do sexually with others. I do believe in taking responsibility for my actions. I do believe in acting responsibly where others are concerned. And I do my best to do no harm.
That said, if being a sanctimonious, self-righteous, fluid-phobic, hermetically sealed, snob-ass, internet trolling, safe sex advocate is what gets you off. Have at it. You have the right. And there is a part of me that sees the good you are trying to do. Yep, I get it. Yours is the better way. I’ll even salute you. But please forgive me if, in that same breath, I also tell you to go fuck yourself. Not because I don’t see the good you do, but because I just don’t like you.
So, back to that question re: barebacking as genocide. Am I suicidal? Probably. On some deeper level that I am no longer interested in exploring, yes, I would like to see me wiped off the face of the earth. But that living part of me? That part that I actually feed and exercise and buzz and shave, and care for and nurture and educate? The real me?
I bareback because I like it. It feels good. It makes me feel closer to man I’m with. I think it’s sexy. I think it’s dirty… and I like it dirty.
My Conclusion:
Safe sex is a personal choice. So is barebacking. You can’t respect the rights of one without respecting the rights of the other. And it is possible to respect somebody and validate their right to do with their bodies what they want and still not agree with them or even buy into how they justify their behavior. Barebacking isn’t for everyone. It takes special ability to deal with fear of the unknown, anxiety, guilt, shame, self-loathing, and the realities of dealing with an STD.
But then, safe sex is not for everyone either.
Barebacking is sex at its most natural. There isn’t that stupid awkward moment when the action stops and someone locates the condom, rips open the foil packet, rolls it down his rod, grabs the lube, smears the lube down the length of the sheathed shaft, and then play resumes. There is no condom-related erectile dysfunction. There is no ‘I am going to ram and ram and ram, but I am not going to cum until I withdraw, tear of this condom, and then jerk off on you’. With barebacking the penis slides in, rams and jams and it all happens with a natural sense of fluidity, motion, and progression.
How can that be bad?
So, here are my final recommendations regarding barebacking:
Act responsibly, even with anonymous strangers. Disclose your status when asked.
Do your best to do no harm.
Get tested for all STDs on a regular basis.
Don’t engage in sexual activity with others if you have or suspect you have a communicable STD.
Never pressure others into engaging in unsafe sex.
And stop hating yourself. (There are plenty in the world doing that for you already.)
Be good to yourself. Be better to others.
Happy fucking, men!
May we all be happy fucking men.
wonderlandburlesque.blogspot.gr/2012/11/acquired-tastes-xxiii-barebacking.html?zx=3c5dbd2da8491340
